|
Part 2 of 4
The Honest Assessment — The Diagnostic Behind This Series
I took the proactive step of drafting The Honest Assessment — Action Item #3 of the Open Letter — a diagnostic report that explains what has driven Colorado's negative innovation trajectory, and how Colorado compares to the states winning the competition for founders, capital, and executive talent. I led its preparation personally, with support from the Caruso Ventures team. It does not represent the views of those who signed the Open Letter or any interest group — its purpose is diagnostic.
The Honest Assessment does not advocate for specific policy changes, nor does it prescribe what Colorado should do. Many of the policies it evaluates were adopted in pursuit of goals that reasonable people consider important — worker protections, environmental stewardship, affordable housing, and social equity among them. The trade-offs are real, and honest governance requires acknowledging both sides of the ledger. What the report does document is that Colorado's current trajectory is producing measurable consequences — companies leaving, capital being deployed elsewhere, and founders choosing other states. Whether those consequences are an acceptable price for the policies producing them is a judgment that belongs to Colorado's political leadership and its voters.
The Honest Assessment, at first glance, reads as an indictment of today's left wing of the Democratic Party. However, the Assessment is not partisan and does not advocate for or against either party's agenda. It is a matter-of-fact readout of why certain geographies — led by Texas, Florida, and Utah — are winning the competition for founders, capital, and executive talent, while others such as California, New York, and Washington state are losing it. Any state can choose to compete on those dimensions, regardless of which party holds power.
Many, and perhaps most, of the tech entrepreneurs and investors leaving California, New York, Washington state, and other Departure Geographies are not choosing Texas, Florida, and the other Destination Geographies because they identify politically with the Republican majorities of those states. They are choosing them because they feel more welcomed and appreciated for the value they create — the companies they build, the jobs they generate, the capital they deploy, and the innovations they bring to market.
It is a policy and cultural choice, not a partisan one. This means Colorado — regardless of which party leads the state — can win these founders and investors back by adopting the specific, measurable conditions that make a state welcoming to those who build.
The report evaluates Colorado against nineteen other geographies across twelve factors organized into four categories — the specific, measurable conditions that founders, investors, and executives actually use to decide where to live, build, and deploy capital.
|